xiaomi mi note 10 vs oppo find x2 neo

Elprecio del Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite en España varía entre 270€ y 336€ en función del modelo específico y sus características. A continuación puedes ver los precios actuales para los diferentes modelos de Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite - Global · 6GB · 64GB: 270 €. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite - Global · 6GB · 128GB CompareXiaomi Mi Note 10 vs Oppo Find X2 Neo. Screen technology, hardware specs and other features. Decide which one is best to buy. Hitesti. Graphics cards. Compare graphics cards. Graphics cards rating NVIDIA ratings AMD ratings. Best graphics cards under $300 Best graphics cards over $300. Best for mining Bitcoin Best for mining Decred Best for mining Etherium Best 1 Snellere processor, minder goed scherm. Laten we beginnen bij de interne hardware. De OnePlus 10T is de snelste smartphone van het bedrijf tot nu toe, want hij beschikt over de Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 -processor. Dit is de snelste chip van dit moment en hij is nog iets rapper dan de ‘normale’ Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in de OnePlus 10 Pro. Comparisonof Oppo Find X2 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro based on specifications, reviews and ratings. We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Data about your interaction with this site and the ads shown to you may be shared with companies involved in the delivery and/or XiaomiMi 11 price in Pakistan is starting from Rs. 144,999 where Oppo Find X2 price in Pakistan is starting from . Here we have shared Xiaomi Mi 11 and Oppo Find X2 differences with respect to price, specifications and features so you can decide Xiaomi Mi 11 vs Oppo Find X2 which is better & best option to consider in Pakistan. nonton the uncanny counter season 2 sub indo. VS Here we compared two mid-range smartphones the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G that was released on March 29, 2021, against the Oppo Find X2 Neo, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and came out 12 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets. DifferencesReviewSpecsBenchmarksBattery lifeCameraComments Key differences An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G Water-resistant body IP53 classification37% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark 529K versus 385KBetter camera quality According to DxOMark ratingNewer Bluetooth version storage via MicroSD card up to 512GBMore recent OS version Android 12 versus 10The phone is 1-year newerHas a built-in infrared port Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X2 Neo The rear camera has a 2x optical zoomShows 8% longer battery life 2944 vs 2733 hoursOptical image stabilizationSlow-motion recording at 240FPSSupports Dolby Atmos sound technology Review Display Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Battery Battery life, charging type and speed Camera Photo and video recording quality Connectivity Networks, ports, data transmission NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Value for money You can enter your local price of these phones in USD or any other currency and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Tests and specifications Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Display Type AMOLED AMOLED Size inches inches Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels Aspect ratio 209 209 PPI 402 ppi 405 ppi Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz Max rated brightness 500 nits 430 nits Max rated brightness in HDR 800 nits - HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10 Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 6 Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Screen-to-body ratio Display features - Always-On Display - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming Display tests RGB color space 100% PWM 367 Hz 370 Hz Response time ms ms Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity Peak brightness test auto Sources NotebookCheck [3], [4] Design and build Height mm inches mm inches Width mm inches mm inches Thickness mm inches mm inches Weight 159 gramm oz 171 gramm oz Waterproof IP53 No Rear material Glass Glass Frame material Plastic Metal Colors Black, Green, Yellow Black, Blue Fingerprint scanner Yes, in home button Yes, in-display Performance Tests of Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G and Oppo Find X2 Neo in the benchmarks SoC Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Max. clock 2400 MHz 2400 MHz CPU cores 8 1 + 3 + 4 8 1 + 1 + 6 Architecture - 4 cores at GHz Kryo 670 Silver Cortex-A55- 3 cores at GHz Kryo 670 Gold Cortex-A78- 1 core at GHz Kryo 670 Prime Cortex-A78 - 6 cores at GHz Kryo 475 Silver Cortex-A55- 1 core at GHz Kryo 475 Gold Cortex-A76- 1 core at GHz Kryo 475 Prime Cortex-A76 Lithography process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers Graphics Adreno 642 Adreno 620 GPU clock 490 MHz 750 MHz FLOPS - ~700 GFLOPS Memory RAM size 6, 8 GB 12 GB Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory clock 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Channels 2 2 Storage Storage size 128, 256 GB 256 GB Storage type UFS UFS Memory card MicroSD No Memory card max. size Up to 512 GB - Benchmarks Geekbench 5 Single-Core CPU 161152 111931 GPU 162000 102224 Memory 88725 80545 UX 119299 91942 Total score 529365 385031 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 79% 99% Graphics test 18 FPS 9 FPS Graphics score 3124 1665 PCMark score 10461 - Software Operating system Android 11 Can be upgraded to Android 12 Android 10 ROM MIUI 13 ColorOS 7 OS size 11 GB 31 GB Battery Specifications Capacity 4250 mAh 4025 mAh Charge power 33 W 30 W Battery type Li-Po Li-Po Replaceable No No Wireless charging No No Reverse charging No No Fast charging Yes, Quick Charge 4+ 58% in 30 min Yes, VOOC 50% in 20 min Full charging time 105 hr 050 hr Battery life tests Web browsing 0910 hr 0959 hr Watching video 1442 hr 1307 hr Gaming 0430 hr 0509 hr Standby 80 hr 101 hr Camera Specs and camera test of smartphones Main camera Matrix 64 megapixels 48 megapixels Image resolution 9248 x 6936 8000 x 6000 Zoom Digital Optical, 2x Flash Dual LED Dual LED Stabilization Digital Optical 8K video recording No No 4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS 1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS Slow motion 120 FPS 1080p 240 FPS 720p Angle of widest lens 119° 115° Lenses 3 64 MP + 8 MP + 5 MP 4 48 MP + 13 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP Wide main lens - 64 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 26 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung GW3 ISOCELL CMOS - Phase autofocus - 48 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 26 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Sony IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization Telephoto lens - - 13 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 53 mm - Pixel size 1 micron - Sensor 1/ CMOS - Phase autofocus Ultra-wide lens - 8 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 13 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/4" CMOS - 8 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 13 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung S5K3H7 ISOCELL CMOS Monochrome lens - - 2 MP - Aperture f/ - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ CMOS Macro lens - 5 MP - Aperture f/ - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/5" CMOS - Phase autofocus - Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - Bokeh mode - Pro mode Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G from DxOMark Photo samples of Oppo Find X2 Neo from DxOMark Selfie camera Megapixels 20 megapixels 44 megapixels Image resolution 5184 x 3888 - Aperture f/ f/ Focal length 27 mm 26 mm Pixel size microns microns Sensor type CMOS ISOCELL CMOS Sensor size 1/ 1/ Video resolution 1080p Full HD at 60 FPS 1080p Full HD at 30 FPS DxOMark camera tests Connectivity Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi 6 a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display Bluetooth version Bluetooth features LE, HID, A2DP LE, A2DP USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C USB version 2 USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS NFC* Yes Yes Infrared port Yes No Network Number of SIM* 2 2 Type of SIM card Nano Nano Multi SIM mode Standby Standby eSIM support* No No Hybrid slot Yes No LTE Cat* 20 20 5G support Yes No Sound Speakers Stereo Stereo Headphone audio jack No No FM radio No No Dolby Atmos No Yes Other Category Mid-range Mid-range Announced March 2021 April 2020 Release date April 2021 June 2020 Sensors - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint *Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country. Conclusion If the display, performance, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G. But if the camera and sound are more of a priority – go for the Oppo Find X2 Neo. Cast your vote So, which phone would you choose? Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 0 0% Total votes < 1 Related comparisons You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Sistema OperativoDisponibilitàDimensioniPesoPUNTEGGIQualità PrezzoHardware- Display- Fotocamera- PrestazioniRETESim CardDual SimGsmHSPA+LTE5GMax Download SpeedMax Upload SpeedDATI TECNICIProcessoreChipset64 BitGPURAMMemoria MaxMemoria EspandibileDISPLAYPolliciRisoluzioneDensità PixelTipoColoriProtezioneFOTOCAMERAMegapixelRisoluzioneDimensione SensoreAperture SizeStabilizzazioneAutofocusTouch FocusZoom OtticoFlashHDRGeo TaggingFace DetectionSmile DetectionFotocamera FrontaleVIDEOVideo Auto FocusVideo FpsVideo StabilizerSlow MotionStereo Sound RecFoto in VideoVideocamera FrontaleOpzioni Fotocamera FrontaleCONNETTIVITA'Wi-FiBluetoothUSBIRDANFCGPSSENSORIAccelerometroProssimitàGiroscopioBussolaBarometroImpronta DigitaleMic. di Riduzione RumoreFUNZIONIRadio FMVibrazioneVivavoceAltroBATTERIATipoAmpere 333 € Miglior Prezzo 333 € - 405 € Vedi tutte le 8 offerte Android 10 MIUI 112020/ x x mm204 / / / / / 10NanoDual stand-byQuad Band 850/900/1800/1900800 Mbps150 Mbps2x GHz Kyro 470 Gold + 6x GHz Kyro 470 SilverSnapdragon 730G Qualcomm SDM730GAdreno 6186 GB128 x 2340 pixel398 ppiAMOLED16 milioniGorilla Glass 564 Mp + 8 Mp + 5 Mp + 2 Mp9238 x 6928 pixel1/ " + 1/4 " + 1/5 " + 1/5 "F + F + F + F LED-16 Mp F 2160p30 fps960 fpsFull HD, 30fpsHDR/Face a/b/g/n/ con A2DP/LE/aptXType-C DirectWi-Fi hotspotUSB OTGLiPo5260 mAh 379 € Miglior Prezzo 379 € - 699 € Vedi le 4 offerte Android 10 ColorOS 72020/ x x mm171 / / / 107 / / 10NanoDual stand-byQuad Band 850/900/1800/19003700 Mbps1600 Mbps1x GHz Kyro 475 Prime + 1x GHz Kyro 475 Gold + 6x GHz Kyro 475 SilverSnapdragon 765G Qualcomm SDM765GAdreno 62012 GB256 x 2400 pixel402 ppiAMOLED16 milioniGorilla Glass 548 Mp + 13 Mp + 8 Mp + 2 Mp8000 x 6000 pixel1/ " + 1/ " + 1/ " + 1/5 "F + F + F + F / Digitale2 xDual LED32 Mp F 2160p30 fps240 fpsFull HD, 30fpsHDR/Face a/b/g/n/ac/ con LE/EDR/A2DP/aptXType-C DirectWi-Fi hotspotUSB OTGLiPo4025 mAh 309 € Miglior Prezzo 309 € - 405 € Vedi tutte le 7 offerte Android 10 MIUI 112020/ x x mm192 / / / / / 10NanoDual stand-byQuad Band 850/900/1800/19007500 Mbps3000 Mbps1x GHz Kryo 475 Prime + 1x GHz Kryo 475 Gold + 6x GHz Kryo 475 SilverSnapdragon 765G Qualcomm SDM765Adreno 6206 GB128 x 2340 pixel401 ppiAMOLED16 milioniGorilla Glass 548 Mp + 8 Mp + 2 Mp + 2 Mp8000 x 6000 pixel1/2 "F + F + F + F LED16 Mp F 2160p30 fps120 fps-Full HD, 30fpsHDR/Face a/b/g/n/ con A2DP/LE/aptXType-C DirectWi-Fi hotspotUSB OTGLiPo4160 mAh The Oppo Find X3 Neo is the middle entry in the company’s X series, slotted between the top-end X3 Pro and the X3 Lite. It features a 90-Hz FHD+ AMOLED display, Qualcomm’s 865 chipset with 5G support, and 12 GB of memory along with 256 GB of storage. There are four cameras on the back. The primary module uses a 50 MP Sony sensor. There’s also a dedicated tele-module that offers a 2x optical zoom. Both those cameras have the same specs as on the top-of-the-line Find X3 Pro. The Neo’s ultra-wide has to make do with a 16 MP sensor instead of the Pro’s 50 MP variant, though. There’s also a 2 MP wide-angle macro module for getting extra close to objects. Read on to find out how the Find X3 Neo performs in our DXOMARK Camera tests. Key camera specifications Primary 50 MP 1/ sensor with 1 µm pixels, 24 mm-equivalent f/ lens, OIS, PDAF, DOL-HDR Ultra-wide 16 MP 1/ sensor with 1 µm pixels, 14 mm-equivalent f/ lens, 123° mm measured field of view fixed-focus lens Tele 13 MP 1/ sensor with 1 µm pixels, 52 mm-equivalent f/ AF lens Macro 2 MP 1/5-inch sensor with µm pixels, 22 mm-equivalent f/ fixed focus lens LED flash 2160p at 60/30 fps, 1080p at 60/30 fps, 720p at 60/30 fps 4K 30 fps tested About DXOMARK Camera tests For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here. Test summary Oppo Find X3 Neo 115 camera 84 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 95 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 84 Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 99 Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 71 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 64 Best Google Pixel 6 77 39 Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 60 Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 54 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 87 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 38 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 87 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 92 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 90 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 94 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 71 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 74 Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Best Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 84 91 Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 Position in Global Ranking 70th 5. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 137 10. Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 133 14. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Snapdragon 131 14. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra Exynos 131 14. Vivo X70 Pro MediaTek 131 21. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max 130 30. Samsung Galaxy S22+ Exynos 126 30. Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 126 30. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos 126 34. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 124 34. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G 124 37. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 123 42. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 121 42. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Exynos 121 44. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Snapdragon 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G Exynos 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Exynos 120 44. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Exynos 120 44. Vivo X60 Pro 5G Snapdragon 120 53. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G Snapdragon 119 53. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Snapdragon 119 56. Apple iPhone SE 2022 118 56. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G 118 56. Vivo X60 Pro 5G Exynos 118 62. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 117 66. Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G Exynos 116 66. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Exynos 116 66. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ 5G Exynos 116 70. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Exynos 115 78. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Snapdragon 112 89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 5G 109 89. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 109 91. Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ 108 98. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 106 101. Motorola Edge 20 Pro 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 105 101. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G 105 111. Apple iPhone SE 2020 103 114. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G 102 114. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 102 120. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G 97 122. Honor Magic4 Lite 5G 95 124. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S 92 127. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G 89 128. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G 88 128. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 88 128. Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022 88 132. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G 87 Position in Premium Ranking 21st 1. Vivo X70 Pro MediaTek 131 4. Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 126 8. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 121 9. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Snapdragon 120 9. Vivo X60 Pro 5G Snapdragon 120 15. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Snapdragon 119 17. Vivo X60 Pro 5G Exynos 118 20. Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Exynos 116 21. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Exynos 115 Pros Stills color pleasant indoors and outdoors Wide stills dynamic range indoors and outdoors Fairly high stills detail Wide dynamic range in zoom shots Effective subject isolation in portrait mode Video exposure accurate and stable, even in low light Video detail is high Video white balance mostly stable, with smooth transitions Cons Stills AF slow to react, limited depth of field Stills exposure is low, with clipped shadows in low light Stills artifacts ringing, ghosting, hue shift near saturation High noise and color fringing in ultra-wide shots Limited resolution when zoomed in Video noise high in low light Stabilization ineffective when walking Strong ringing artifacts sometimes visible in videos With an overall score of 115, the Oppo Find X3 Neo lands around the middle of our general rankings. It also sits mid-pack among other phones in the Premium segment, tying the Samsung S20 FE Exynos, but landing below the class-leading Apple iPhone 12 122. The Oppo Find X3 Neo delivers nice color and accurate exposure for this scene. Its Photo score of 117 is among the lower scores in the Premium segment, tying the Huawei P40 but fairly distant from the iPhone 12’s score of 132. The main camera produces accurately exposed photos with pleasant color in bright outdoor light and more moderate indoor lighting. Dynamic range is wide, and detail levels are high. The portrait mode also does a fairly good job of bringing the subject out of the background. On the other hand, when the lights get low, underexposure and crushed shadows become a problem. Autofocus speed could also be better for a phone in this segment. The Zoom composite score of 68 is quite good for the Premium category. Tele performance is respectable, missing the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Exynos by a single point and roundly trouncing most phones that lack a dedicated tele camera, like the iPhone 12 41. Wide performance is good, tying the likes of the Xiaomi Mi 11 and the Google Pixel 5. The video score of 103 is respectable, though a handful of phones in the category do better. The Oppo Find X3 Neo is fairly competitive within its category, and though it does not particularly excel in any one aspect except perhaps zoom, it will deliver decent results in most situations. Below you can find detailed analyses and image samples for all Photo, Zoom, and Video sub-attributes, along with comparisons with some of the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s competitors. Photo The Oppo Find X3 Neo achieves a Photo score of 117. In this section, we take a closer look at each sub-attribute and compare image quality against competitors. Exposure and Contrast Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 In these tests we analyze target exposure, contrast, and dynamic range, including repeatability across a series of images. Tests are undertaken in a wide range of light conditions, including backlit scenes and low light down to 1 lux. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s exposure performance in low-light conditions. Oppo Find X3 Neo, underexposure, clipped shadows Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon, pleasantly bright exposure OnePlus 9 Pro, acceptable exposure Color Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 In these tests we analyze color rendering, skin tones, white balance, and color shading, including repeatability across a series of images. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s color performance in bright light. Oppo Find X3 Neo, mostly accurate color, high saturation Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon, accurate, pleasant color OnePlus 9 Pro, accurate, pleasant color Autofocus Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 In these tests we analyze autofocus accuracy and shooting time, including repeatability, in the lab. We test focus failures, depth of field, and tracking of moving subjects using perceptual analysis of real-life images. This graph shows autofocus performance of the Oppo Find X3 Neo in 1000 lux light. AF speed and accuracy at 1000 lux, handheld Oppo Find X3 Neo is slightly slower than the reference phones. Texture Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 In these tests we analyze texture on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of light conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual analysis of real-life images. This graph shows the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s texture measurements in the lab. Texture comparison The level of detail is fairly high. Noise Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 In these tests we analyze noise on faces and objects, including objects in motion, in a range of light conditions, using several lab test setups and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s noise performance in indoor light. Oppo Find X3 Neo, indoor noise Oppo Find X3 Neo, crop reasonably well-controlled noise OnePlus 9 Pro, indoor noise OnePlus 9 Pro, crop a bit more noise Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon, indoor noise Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon, crop a bit less noise Bokeh Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 For these tests we switch to the camera’s bokeh or portrait mode and analyze depth estimation, bokeh shape, blur gradient, and repeatability, as well as all other general image quality attributes mentioned above. The score is derived from perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s bokeh simulation outdoors. Oppo Find X3 Neo, natural blur gradient with 24mm-equivalent focal length Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon, natural blur gradient, shallow depth of field Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, natural blur with 50mm-equivalent focal Night Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 In these tests we shoot a selection of images in pitch-black darkness as well as with city lights in the background providing some illumination. We shoot sample images with the camera at default settings in both flash-auto and flash-off modes. We analyze all image quality attributes but we pay particular attention to exposure, autofocus, and color. We do not test night modes that have to be activated manually. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s night performance in flash-auto mode. Oppo Find X3 Neo, flash-auto clipped shadows Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, flash-auto more shadow detail OnePlus 9 Pro, flash-auto more shadow detail Artifacts Google Pixel 6 Best Google Pixel 6 77 In these tests we check images for optical artifacts such as vignetting, flare, lens softness in the corner, distortion, and chromatic aberrations, as well as for processing artifacts such as ghosting and fusion errors, hue shift, and ringing. This sample shows artifacts in the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s photos. Oppo Find X3 Neo, artifacts Oppo Find X3 Neo, crop ghosting in hair Preview Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 In these tests we analyze the quality of the preview image and the differences between preview images and captured images, particularly in terms of exposure, dynamic range, and bokeh effect. We also check the smoothness of the field-of-view changes in the preview image when zooming with both buttons or when using the pinch-zoom gesture. This graph shows the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s preview performance. Preview exposure on faces is accurate in bright high-contrast light, but too dark in lower high-contrast light. The Oppo Find X3 Neo achieves a Zoom score of 68. The Zoom score includes the tele and wide sub-scores. In this section, we take a closer look at how these sub-scores were achieved and compare zoom image quality against competitors. Wide Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 In these tests we analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at several focal lengths from 12 to 20 mm. We look at all image quality attributes, but we pay particular attention to such artifacts as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. These samples show the performance of the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s ultra-wide camera in outdoor conditions. Oppo Find X3 Neo, ultra-wide Oppo Find X3 Neo, crop high noise and color fringing Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon, ultra-wide Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Snapdragon, crop light noise, some fringing Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, ultra-wide Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, crop well-controlled noise and fringing Tele Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 In these tests we analyze all image quality attributes at focal lengths from approximately 40 to 300 mm, paying particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a number of objective measurements in the lab and perceptual analysis of real-life images. These samples show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s tele performance outdoors at a 50 mm-equivalent zoom setting. Oppo Find X3 Neo, 50 mm zoom Oppo Find X3 Neo, crop good dynamic range, autofocus slightly, color not accurate Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Exynos, 50 mm zoom Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G Exynos, crop limited dynamic range, better detail on face detail OnePlus 9 Pro, 50 mm zoom OnePlus 9 Pro, crop limited dynamic range, more natural color Video The Oppo Find X3 Neo achieves a Video score of 103. A device’s overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a range of attributes in the same way as the Photo score. In this section, we take a closer look at these sub-scores and compare video quality against competitors. In our Video tests we analyze the same image quality attributes as for still images, such as white balance and color rendering, but we also include such temporal aspects as speed, smoothness and stability of exposure, and autofocus. NOTE The sample video clips in this section are best viewed at 4K resolution. Exposure and Contrast Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 These video stills show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s video exposure characteristics in low light compared to the competition. Oppo Find X3 Neo, video still accurate target exposure but clipped shadows Xiaomi Mi 11, video still underexposure in low light Oppo Find X3 Pro, video still accurate target exposure, but visible instabilities Color Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 These video stills show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s video color in outdoor light compared to the competition. Oppo Find X3 Neo, video still pleasant color Xiaomi Mi 11, video still slight warm cast Oppo Find X3 Pro, video still pleasant color Autofocus Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 These sample clips show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s video autofocus performance. Oppo Find X3 Neo, slight focus breathing visible Xiaomi Mi 11, accurate, stable autofocus in this scene Oppo Find X3 Pro, generally stable autofocus Texture Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 This graph shows the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s video texture performance in the lab. Oppo Find X3 Neo video texture Detail in videos is quite high, though noise is also high see below. Noise Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 This graph shows the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s video noise performance in the lab. Oppo Find X3 Neo video noise Noise is higher than reference devices. Artifacts Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Best Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 84 For video artifacts, we check for the same kinds of artifacts mentioned in the Photo section, along with such video-specific artifacts as frame rate variation in different light conditions, judder effect, and moving artifacts artifacts such as aliasing, color quantization, and flare can often be more intrusive when moving than in a still image. These video stills show some of the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s video artifacts. Oppo Find X3 Neo, video still Oppo Find X3 Neo, crop ringing on edges Xiaomi Mi 11, video still Xiaomi Mi 11, crop noisy edges Oppo Find X3 Pro, video still Oppo Find X3 Pro, crop very slight ringing Stabilization Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 In these tests we analyze residual motion when handholding the camera during recording, as well as when walking and running with the camera. We also look for stabilization artifacts such as jello effect, sharpness differences between frames, and frame shift abrupt changes of framing. These sample clips show the Oppo Find X3 Neo’s video stabilization compared to the competition. Oppo Find X3 Neo, visible residual motion both in static scenes and while walking Xiaomi Mi 11, acceptable stabilization Oppo Find X3 Pro, effective stabilization VS Here we compared two mid-range smartphones the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro with Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G that was released on March 4, 2021, against the Oppo Find X2 Lite, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the gadgets. DifferencesReviewSpecsBenchmarksBattery lifeCameraComments Key differences An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Water-resistant body IP53 classificationHigher display refresh rate – 120 HzComes with 995 mAh larger battery capacity 5020 vs 4025 mAhExpandable storage via MicroSD card up to 512GBMore recent OS version Android 12 versus 10Slow-motion recording at 960FPSStereo speakersDelivers 15% higher peek brightness 719 against 626 nitsThe phone is 11-months newerHas a built-in infrared port Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X2 Lite Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks Review Display Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Battery Battery life, charging type and speed Camera Photo and video recording quality Connectivity Networks, ports, data transmission NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Value for money You can enter your local price of these phones in USD or any other currency and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Tests and specifications Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Display Type AMOLED AMOLED Size inches inches Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels Aspect ratio 209 209 PPI 395 ppi 408 ppi Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz Max rated brightness 450 nits 430 nits Max rated brightness in HDR 1200 nits - HDR support Yes, HDR10 No Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Screen-to-body ratio Display features - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - Always-On Display - DC Dimming Display tests RGB color space 100% PWM 490 Hz 247 Hz Response time ms ms Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity Peak brightness test auto Sources NotebookCheck [3], [4] Design and build Height 165 mm inches mm inches Width mm inches mm inches Thickness mm inches mm inches Weight 193 gramm oz 180 gramm oz Waterproof IP53 No Rear material Glass Glass Frame material Plastic Metal Colors Gold, Gray, Blue White, Black Fingerprint scanner Yes, in home button Yes, in-display Performance Tests of Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Oppo Find X2 Lite in the benchmarks SoC Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Max. clock 2300 MHz 2400 MHz CPU cores 8 2 + 6 8 1 + 1 + 6 Architecture - 6 cores at GHz Kryo 470 Silver Cortex-A55- 2 cores at GHz Kryo 470 Gold Cortex-A76 - 6 cores at GHz Kryo 475 Silver Cortex-A55- 1 core at GHz Kryo 475 Gold Cortex-A76- 1 core at GHz Kryo 475 Prime Cortex-A76 L3 cache 1 MB - Lithography process 8 nanometers 7 nanometers Graphics Adreno 618 Adreno 620 GPU clock 810 MHz 750 MHz FLOPS ~435 GFLOPS ~700 GFLOPS Memory RAM size 6, 8 GB 8 GB Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory clock 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Channels 2 2 Storage Storage size 64, 128 GB 128 GB Storage type UFS UFS Memory card MicroSD No Memory card max. size Up to 512 GB - Benchmarks Geekbench 5 Single-Core CPU 100690 108358 GPU 97646 102982 Memory 51265 74220 UX 99177 88043 Total score 348657 370585 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 99% - Graphics test 6 FPS - Graphics score 1116 - PCMark score 8508 - Sources 3DMark [3] Software Operating system Android 11 Can be upgraded to Android 12 Android 10 ROM MIUI 13 ColorOS 7 OS size 13 GB 22 GB Battery Specifications Capacity 5020 mAh 4025 mAh Charge power 33 W 30 W Battery type Li-Po Li-Po Replaceable No No Wireless charging No No Reverse charging No No Fast charging Yes 50% in 30 min Yes, VOOC 50% in 20 min Full charging time 121 hr 050 hr Battery life tests Web browsing 1011 hr - Watching video 1400 hr - Gaming 0530 hr - Standby 74 hr - Camera Specs and camera test of smartphones Main camera Matrix 108 megapixels 48 megapixels Image resolution 12032 x 9024 8000 x 6000 Zoom Digital Digital Flash LED Dual LED Stabilization Digital Digital 8K video recording No No 4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS 1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS Slow motion 960 FPS 1080p 240 FPS 720p Angle of widest lens 118° 116° Lenses 4 108 MP + 8 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP 4 48 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP Wide main lens - 108 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 26 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung S5KHM2 ISOCELL Plus CMOS - Phase autofocus - 48 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 26 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Sony IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS - Phase autofocus Ultra-wide lens - 8 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 13 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Sony IMX355 CMOS - 8 MP - Aperture f/ - Focal length 13 mm - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ CMOS Monochrome lens - - 2 MP - Aperture f/ - Pixel size micron - Sensor 1/ Samsung S5K3M5 ISOCELL CMOS Macro lens - 5 MP - Aperture f/ - Sensor 1/5", Omnivision OV5675 - Phase autofocus - Depth lens - 2 MP - Aperture f/ - Pixel size micron - 2 MP - Aperture f/ - Pixel size micron Camera features - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - Bokeh mode - Pro mode Samples Photo samples of Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro from DxOMark - Selfie camera Megapixels 16 megapixels 32 megapixels Image resolution 4608 x 3456 6550 x 4928 Aperture f/ f/ Focal length - 26 mm Pixel size 1 microns microns Sensor type Exmor-RS CMOS ISOCELL CMOS Sensor size 1/ 1/ Video resolution 1080p Full HD at 30 FPS 1080p Full HD at 30 FPS DxOMark camera tests Connectivity Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 6 a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi features - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display Bluetooth version Bluetooth features LE, HID, A2DP LE, A2DP USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C USB version 2 2 USB features - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS NFC* Yes Yes Infrared port Yes No Network Number of SIM* 2 2 Type of SIM card Nano Nano Multi SIM mode Standby Standby eSIM support* No No Hybrid slot No No LTE Cat* 15 20 5G support No Yes Sound Speakers Stereo Mono Headphone audio jack Yes Yes FM radio Yes No Dolby Atmos Yes Yes Other Category Mid-range Mid-range Announced March 2021 April 2020 Release date March 2021 June 2020 SAR head W/kg - SAR body W/kg - Sensors - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint *Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country. Conclusion If the display, software, camera, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. But if the performance and connectivity are more of a priority – go for the Oppo Find X2 Lite. Cast your vote So, which phone would you choose? Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 3 100% Total votes 3 Related comparisons You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Si vous souhaitez acheter un smartphone à un prix allant de 450 à 500 euros, vous tomberez certainement sur l'Oppo Reno 2 et le Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Lequel de ces deux smartphones est le meilleur ? On vous donne notre avis, point par point. En fin d’année dernière, le segment des smartphones autour de 500 euros s’est réveillé d’un coup avec l’arrivée coup sur coup de deux concurrents sur le marché, l’Oppo Reno 2 et le Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Deux smartphones dotés de la même puce Snapdragon 730G, orientés tous les deux vers la photo, mais avec de nombreux arguments à faire valoir. Design, autonomie, performances, photo, logiciel et écran, nous allons voir point par point lequel est le meilleur smartphone. 8 /10 8 /10 Fiches techniques des 2 smartphones Modèle Oppo Reno 2 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Version de l'OS Android Android Interface constructeur ColorOS MIUI Taille d'écran pouces pouces Définition 2400 x 1080 pixels 2340 x 1080 pixels Densité de pixels 401 ppp 398 ppp Technologie OLED OLED SoC Snapdragon 730G Snapdragon 730G Puce Graphique GPU Qualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 618 Mémoire vive RAM 8 Go 6 Go, 8 Go, 12 Go Mémoire interne flash 128 Go, 256 Go 128 Go, 256 Go Appareil photo dorsal Capteur 1 48 MpxCapteur 2 13 MpxCapteur 3 8 MpxCapteur 4 2 Mpx Capteur 1 108 MpxCapteur 2 5 MpxCapteur 3 12 MpxCapteur 4 20 MpxCapteur 5 2 Mpx Appareil photo frontal 16 Mpx 32 Mpx Enregistrement vidéo 4K30 IPS 4K30 IPS Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 ac Wi-Fi 5 ac Bluetooth Bandes supportées 2100 MHz B1, 800 MHz B20, 1800 MHz B3, 2600 MHz B7, 700 MHz B28 2100 MHz B1, 800 MHz B20, 1800 MHz B3, 2600 MHz B7, 700 MHz B28 5G Non Non NFC Oui Oui Capteur d'empreintes Sous l'écran Sous l'écran Ports entrées/sorties USB Type-C USB Type-C Batterie 4000 mAh 5260 mAh Dimensions 74,3 x 160 x 9,5 mm 74,2 x 157,8 x 9,7 mm Poids 189 grammes 208 grammes Couleurs Noir, Bleu Noir, Blanc, Rouge, Bleu, Vert Prix 389 € 121 € Fiche produit Voir le test Fiche produit Voir le test Sur le papier, les deux smartphones proposent des caractéristiques assez proches avec un écran OLED de même taille, une même puce Snapdragon 730G, quatre ou cinq appareils photo au dos. On notera cependant une différence de taille au niveau de la batterie, de 4000 mAh sur l’Oppo Reno 2, et de 5260 mAh sur le Mi Note 10. Reste à voir dans le détail quelles sont les différences concrètes entre les deux modèles. Un Oppo Reno 2 original, mais lisse Les smartphones d’Oppo et Xiaomi proposent deux versions bien différentes en termes de design. En façade, l’Oppo Reno 2 arbore ainsi un design assez original. Son écran de 6,5 pouces n’est ainsi découpé par aucune encoche, pas plus que par un poinçon pour l’appareil photo. La caméra selfie est en fait logée dans une partie mécanique en forme d’aileron de requin, signature de la gamme Reno d’Oppo. Au dos, l’Oppo Reno 2 joue aussi sur la sobriété. Le smartphone a beau être équipé de quatre appareils photo, aucun ne dépasse du châssis. Pratique pour éviter que le smartphone ne soit bancal lorsqu’on l’utilise à plat sur un bureau. Sur la tranche inférieure, l’Oppo Reno 2 est doté d’une prise USB-C et d’une prise casque en plus du haut-parleur. On va également retrouver un tiroir pour double carte nano-SIM ou carte nano-SIM+carte microSD. De son côté, le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 fait bien plus dans le classique. En façade, on retrouve un écran de 6,47 pouces cette fois découpé d’une petite encoche en forme de goutte d’eau. Au dos, le module photo est cette fois bien plus visible, situé à la verticale en haut à gauche et intégrant pas moins de cinq appareils photo. Et cette fois, le smartphone est clairement bancal à plat. On retrouve par ailleurs une prise USB-C et une prise casque sur la tranche inférieure. Enfin, si l’on peut intégrer deux cartes nano-SIM, impossible d’étendre le stockage par carte microSD. Sur le design, on aura tendance à privilégier l’Oppo Reno 2. Non seulement l’écran n’est pas découpé, mais le smartphone est bien plus lisse avec son dos sans excroissance, et on appréciera la possibilité d’étendre le stockage. Deux excellentes dalles OLED Les deux smartphones sont dotés d’écrans OLED avec des diagonales très proches de 6,5 pouces pour l’Oppo Reno 2 et de 6,47 pouces pour le Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Par ailleurs, le smartphone d’Oppo propose une définition de 2400×1080 pixels, plus allongée que l’écran de Xiaomi avec ses 2340×1080 pixels. Enfin, la densité de pixels est là aussi très proche avec 401 pixels par pouce pour le Reno 2, contre 398 pixels par pouce pour le Mi Note 10. Sur les mesures d’écran, on constate que l’Oppo Reno 2 propose une très bonne luminosité de 538 cd/m². Il permet par ailleurs d’afficher 101 % du spectre colorimétrique DCI-P3 et, même s’il propose une température des blancs assez froide, à 7406K, on peut la réchauffer à 6521K — très proche de la température de référence à 6500K — en passant à la température la plus chaude possible. De son côté, le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 peut quant à lui monter à une luminosité de 572 cd/m², là aussi très bonne. Son écran permet lui aussi de couvrir l’ensemble de l’espace colorimétrique DCI-P3, à 104%, et est lui aussi très froid par défaut, avec une température mesurée à 7500K. On pourra cependant là aussi le réchauffer dans les paramètres d’affichage. Sur la qualité de l’écran, on a donc deux smartphones avec un très bel affichage, qu’il s’agisse de la luminosité maximale, de la couverture colorimétrique ou de la fidélité des couleurs. On accordera néanmoins le point au Mi Note 10 de Xiaomi pour sa luminosité maximale un poil plus élevée. MIUI face à ColorOS Au niveau de l’interface, les deux smartphones proposent un logiciel bien différent avec ColorOS adossé à Android Pie pour l’Oppo Reno 2, et MIUI 11 basé sur Android Pie pour le Xiaomi Mi Note 10. On a donc deux smartphones utilisant la version précédente d’Android, et non pas Android 10, du moins d’ici de futures mises à jour. Pour l’Oppo Reno 2, on sait que le constructeur chinois a fait quelques efforts pour son interface ColorOS. Néanmoins, cela n’est pas suffisant et il reste quelques erreurs dans les traductions et l’agencement est encore assez fouilli dans les options. On apprécie cependant les choix de personnalisation comme le réglage de la barre de navigation, l’intégration d’un tiroir d’applications optionnel ou la sécurisation des applications par lecteur d’empreintes digitales. De son côté, le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 s’en sort très bien grâce à la dernière version de MIUI. Si les paramètres sont toujours aussi nombreux et compliqués à appréhender, on apprécie là aussi les nombreuses options de personnalisation, le thème sombre global ou l’écran Always-on. C’est surtout le tiroir d’applications qui va manquer à l’appel, mais il reste possible d’installer un lanceur d’applications. De base, on aurait tendance à privilégier le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 pour son interface logicielle. Cependant, l’absence de tiroir d’application peut être un frein pour certains, alors qu’il est proposé en option sur l’Oppo Reno 2. Les deux smartphones s’en tirent donc avec un match nul sur cette manche. Le Snapdragon 730G face au… Snapdragon 730G Les deux smartphones sont équipés du même SoC, à savoir le Snapdragon 730G de Qualcomm, une puce milieu de gamme qui se veut néanmoins assez performante pour les jeux 3D. À côté, on retrouve 6 Go de RAM pour le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 et 8 Go de RAM pour l’Oppo Reno 2. Les deux smartphones s’en tirent sans peine dans la navigation au sein des menus ou des applications, dans les jeux 2D et même dans les jeux 3D. Néanmoins, malgré cette puce, impossible de passer Fortnite à une qualité épique ou élevée, puisqu’Epic Games accorde l’accès à ces niveaux directement côté serveur. Xiaomi Mi Note 10Oppo Reno 2 SoCS730GS730G AnTuTu 684263 099 PCMark 3297 257 3DMark Slingshot Extreme2 4012 395 Lecture / écriture séquentielle498 / 244 Mo/s470 / 201 Mo/s Lecture / écriture aléatoire26,6k / 30,2k IOPS36,3K / 57,6K IOPS Avec une session de benchmarks, on constate, fort logiquement, que les deux smartphones font jeu égal. Il n’y a que sur les tests d’écriture et de lecture que l’Oppo Reno 2 s’en sort un peu mieux. Dans l’ensemble, c’est donc un match nul sur ce point entre les deux smartphones. Quatre ou cinq appareils photo du dos Les deux smartphones sont taillés pour la photo, avec quatre appareils au dos de l’Oppo Reno 2, et cinq à celui du Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Oppo Reno 2 Appareil principal de 48 mégapixels f/1,7 Appareil zoom x2 de 13 mégapixels f/2,4 Appareil ultra grand-angle de 8 mégapixels f/2,2 Capteur de profondeur de 2 mégapixels f/2,4 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Appareil principal de 108 mégapixels f/1,69 Appareil zoom x2 de 12 mégapixels f/2,0 Appareil zoom x5 de 5 mégapxiels f/2,0 Appareil ultra grand-angle de 20 mégapixels f/2,0 Appareil macro de 2 mégapixels Sur le papier déjà, on constate que le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 propose un module photo bien plus complet, puisqu’il ajoute un téléobjectif avec zoom optique x5 au simple zoom x2. De plus, si Oppo s’est contenté d’un appareil dédié au flou d’arrière-plan, Xiaomi propose quant à lui un objectif conçu pour la photo macro, bien plus utile au quotidien, tout en gérant de manière logicielle la profondeur de champ pour le mode portrait. Ci-dessous, retrouvez la photo de l’Oppo Reno 2 à gauche, et celle du Xiaomi Mi Note 10 à droite Oppo Reno 2 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 En plein jour, les deux smartphones parviennent sans peine à gérer les hautes plages dynamiques. On notera cependant que la photo du Xiaomi Mi Note 10 est bien plus détaillée grâce à son capteur principal de 108 mégapixels. Oppo Reno 2 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 En basse lumière, le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 s’en tire là encore mieux que l’Oppo Reno 2 grâce à des clichés plus lumineux et surtout mieux détaillés. Là où le smartphone d’Oppo a tendance à mélanger le feuillage des arbres dans une forme indistincte, celui de Xiaomi permet de mieux les voir individuellement. Oppo Reno 2 Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pour le mode portrait, malgré l’absence de capteur dédié, le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 s’en tire haut la main. Il propose des images bien détaillées avec des mèches de cheveux bien découpées de l’arrière-plan. Dans l’ensemble, que ce soit en basse lumière, en mode portrait ou avec la polyvalence des différents objectifs, c’est donc le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 qui remporte cette manche, notamment grâce à des clichés mieux détaillés grâce à son capteur de 108 mégapixels. De très bonnes autonomies L’Oppo Reno 2 est doté d’une batterie de 4000 mAh. Le smartphone est par ailleurs fourni avec un chargeur 20W. De son côté, le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 intègre un accumulateur conséquent de 5260 mAh, avec un chargeur 30W. Aucun des deux smartphones n’est cependant compatible avec la charge sans fil. Concrètement, malgré cette différence conséquente entre les deux batteries, le smartphone d’Oppo a réussi à faire aussi bien que celui de Xiaomi sur notre test d’autonomie ViSer. Le Reno 2 a ainsi mis 13h34 avant de passer de 100 % à 10 % de batterie, quand il aura fallu 13h29 pour le Mi Note 10. À l’usage, les deux smartphones permettent allégrement de passer les deux jours d’autonomie, même si le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 permet d’aller encore un peu plus loin. Sur la charge rapide, le Mi Note 10 fait là aussi mieux avec son chargeur 30 W, contre 20 W chez Oppo. C’est surtout sur ce point que l’on va donc accorder la manche au Xiaomi Mi Note 10, même si le Reno 2 n’a pas à rougir de ses performances, loin de là. Lequel choisir entre l’Oppo Reno 2 et le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 ? Lorsqu’on fait le compte des points, on constate que l’Oppo Reno 2 remporte la manche du design quand le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 est devant pour la photo, l’écran et l’autonomie. Les deux smartphones arrivent cependant à égalité sur les performances et le logiciel. C’est donc bel et bien le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 qui vient gagner l’ensemble du match avec trois points contre un. Surtout, le smartphone de Xiaomi est devant sur des critères assez important comme l’autonomie ou la photo. Néanmoins, chacune de ces manches s’est révélée assez disputée et, dans l’ensemble, difficile de médire sur l’Oppo Reno 2 qui reste lui aussi un bon smartphone. Il est simplement moins bon que le Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Si vous hésitez encore entre l’un et l’autre, n’hésitez pas à vous tourner vers les tests complets Test complet du Huawei P30 Test complet du Oppo Reno 2 Prix et disponibilité L’Oppo Reno 2 est disponible autour de 480 euros environ. Pour ce prix, vous pourrez le trouver avec 8 Go de RAM et 128 Go de stockage. De son côté, le Xiaomi Mi Note 10 peut être trouvé au même prix, autour de 485 euros, avec 6 Go de RAM et 128 Go de stockage. Pour nous suivre, nous vous invitons à télécharger notre application Android et iOS. Vous pourrez y lire nos articles, dossiers, et regarder nos dernières vidéos YouTube.

xiaomi mi note 10 vs oppo find x2 neo